Standardizing Difficulties

[Blackhole927]

And then connect the wire to the device and place down a tree prop and then you wire the device to the tree prop now open the terrain menu and get grass block and make a floor so then make the wire go to the floor and then it triggers and makes the igloo show and now you have a boat

[getrithekd]

10/10 difficulty. I think a good example of what you’re trying to get is this:

How to make a voting system (old guide from last forum)

Hey, this is my first somewhat big project on how I made a voting device because I have seen many people wanting to make this for their Among Us game. SPECTATOR: PLAYER WILL BE PUT ON SPECTATOR WHEN PLAYER IS KNOCKED OUT Place down a “Life Cycle” device and choose “Player Knocked Out”, “When Event Occurs, transmit on” **name that “**PlayerIsSpectator”. Place a team switcher down, “Switch Strategy” select specific team and choose “Spectator” team. “Switch to configured team when receiving on” n…

[Blackhole927]

My friend wrote that, I still haven’t stopped teasing him about it lol

[Haiasi]

I was rating the guide, not the difficulty.

[PotionMaster]

@Cameron_Sharer

Well, there are different ways to write a guide.
Instructions
Steps
Pictures
Explanations
Conceptual
Theoretical

I think this could be made into an acronym INSPECT, someone just needs to find something for N like Novel or something

[Cameron_Sharer]

That’s kinda genius…

[getrithekd]

I don’t think that we should have both conceptual and theoretical, since they’re the same things.

[Cameron_Sharer]

That’s also true… So T and N

[margimkitcreator]

@NavyCatZ

It seems people are confused, so I suggest you put in more screenshots. Also, while the information is clear the formatting is a bit hard to understand for complete beginners, so I suggest you slow down on each explanation and say what each step does.

Just some constructive criticism. Great guide! :]

here this is what @NavyCatZ said in the how to make a voting system u quoted it from. it not just how u understand it, it also how other understand it too!

[getrithekd]

That’s what I’m saying that we should do! I think that we should factor in how well the guide was written in the difficulty!

[kyro]

yeah i wanted to say that like a while ago but i feel like itd be harsh if someone said that the guide was written poorly without any proper criticism

[getrithekd]

Well yeah… The rating would have to include what to make better.

[Bird]

The N could be new. Basically, make sure you do not post the exact same thing that has been posted before. Like no reposts.

[Cameron_Sharer]

But what I’m saying is that we shouldn’t let the style of the guide contaminate the difficulty, it could be confusing.

[getrithekd]

The style of the guide won’t determine it. The style just influences how well the reader understands it, and that is what we are rating.

[Cameron_Sharer]

Then we need to rename it and have scores based not only on conceptual difficulties but also on difficulties that arise from misinterpretations.

[getrithekd]

Wiki now!

[Haiasi]

Congratulations! I remember it was so fast!
Welcome to @trust_level_3 @getrithekd!

[getrithekd]

Thanks!

[getrithekd]

So maybe a new system. It would be based on how hard the mechanism is and how hard it is to follow the guide. More on this later.