Can you show me what you did?
In a minute. It does not seem to work with recursion clocks?
Well, if you don’t trigger at very similar times (like only minor AUO differences), then it seems to not work. My experiment backed this. This might prove ticks.
Wow, this is very cool!
(Apoll02’s screenshot has a rare picture of Blackhole927 in it.)
Ok, I can figure this out.
On the left is the confirmation mechanism. It’s hooked (via wire?) to a trigger which is hooked to a repeater (also via wire what the heck is going on here)
The repeater is also connected to a cutter, and there’s another confirmation mechanism to the right? Lifecycle triggers repeater, I assume.
In summary, you have a wire cutter and are testing 2 different methods of cutting.
Out of curiosity, a few things:
One, don’t all the wires skew the test results?
Two, why the repeater clock instead of a traditional trigger clock?
Three, the wire cutter only needs 2 outputs lol it should work fine with just that
Four, why multiple confirmation mechanisms?
Did you know that wires always go clockwise?
One, not necessarily; they fire at different times and would only affect it in a non-result-altering way.
Two, it didn’t work with that.
Three, it needed four for me, I tested all of this already.
Four, wdym?
For four, multiple counters. Also, is the trigger triggering itself with channels?
Yes. The extra counter is what I was testing. The one on the right is control.
Gimai has been discontinued.
Summary
How do you know about gimai?! It’s been 3-4 months lol.
So, given that the cap seems to be per second, I’m willing to bet that it would interfere unless you have it running before the cutter.
Two, wdym a trigger clock didn’t work?
What results have you found?
Can you explain why you think that there aren’t ticks?
It didn’t cut correctly. Two, the second one still ran correctly without reusing a new cutter, so that means that it isn’t per second.
No. But now that you mention it…
Because I have seen incredibly conflicting evidence and we’ve found no ways to track even a semblance of ticks.
@Apoll02 What specific results did you find?