Do you have any thoughts on this?
1 Like
Let me reread, one minute.
2 Likes
Don’t do this, other it might close.
Meant to reply to Himthyjustgoated
1 Like
I like the idea, we also need a way to notate setting efficiently.
2 Likes
Probably taking advantage of the built-in categories.
1 Like
You could use ClicClac and my scientific names guide as a starting point.
1 Like
That sounds incredibly counter-productive. Nobody wants to memorize new names for every single device. It’s a good idea, but we want to make it easier, not harder.
1 Like
I like ClicClac’s names like triggerloop.
They are short and descriptive.
1 Like
I mean, sure. Could be shortened some more. What’s some sort of short character way to say loop?
><
<O>
()
<=>
hmmmm
1 Like
loop.
2 Likes
that takes too long to write. we gotta make it look cool
2 Likes
For devices, perhaps we can use ClicClac’s letter device format. Settings may need keywords instead of just a symbol or letter since there are so many of them.
1 Like
Yeah, that’s what I was thinking. At least, something like that. Maybe not the pictures though.
lp or infinity sign probably. For device settings simple just put ds.
2 Likes
I could probably help with the google drawing, but it would help if there is a way to make a table as a topic
1 Like
For wires, you could use → or for connection. And for channels, you could put c. —>. I don’t know what you think though @Shdwy. And for the others I guess we could use special characters to make it nerdy like chess notation.
2 Likes
(X) Kinda like an infinity sign.
The whole point is to avoid things that are annoying to type out (like special characters)
→ would work though. idk
@apoll02 
“X looks like an infinity sign”
idk lol
what about
(X)
What? Oh. Parenthesis aren’t exactly difficult though.
I mean, you could also use emojis?
loop