flags
i cant figure out how to recreate the error message in testing
1 Like
1 Like
no
1 Like
One of us is going to receive âAdmiredâ soon (but not soon because itâs 5 likes on 300 posts and not 1500 likes.)
2 Likes
Checkers are like nuclear power. Awesome, hard to use properly, but theyâre still awesome. No one can say otherwise.
1 Like
So for concatenation, you would rather use 2 checkers, 5 checks each instead?
Ew no.
1 Like
I would, but only to spite everyone in the anti-checker gang.
1 Like
Iâm not anti-checker (im anti-checker).
1 Like
anti-checker vs anti checker. Hyphens matter a lot.
Unless youâre checking a property. In that case, they are nuclear, but more like a nuclear bomb to your sanity than a source of energy.
1 Like
I bet that you can still do stuff with checkers checking properties, no one has experimented with it yet.
1 Like
No, it really doesnât work.
1 Like
No it always doesnât pass, probably because there is an error in the checker code that makes the function return null or false or something.
1 Like
For me, it always passes even though itâs false.
1 Like
Art requests are still open.
1 Like
Mysz Lore:
I trusted the checker with all my heart. I had used it in my first game to create pseudo vending machines and win detection.
I thought that the checker would do the same well in my second game, Gimkit Shipwars. I used a checker and waited, and my code failed. I kept trying to troubleshoot it until I couldnât anymore. I looked on the forums and other people had buggy checkers. I ended up deleting ship wars because of the betrayal of the checker-checking properties.
Anyways, I didnât realize you could use block code to check properties, because I was dumb.
3 Likes
Draw a mouse with a smiley face or something.
1 Like
Workaround: item granter + inventory item manager linked to a property. Then you can just check the item.
1 Like