Concatenation is synonymous with blocks. Or is it? This guide aims to make concatenation without ANY blocks.
This just compares counters and uses activation/deactivation states. It’ll also use a general for loop (guide coming out on that soon) to check if each is the one we want.
The Guide
First, get your counter (target 0) that you want to concatenate on (copied over from the real counter). Next, place the trigger that receives on the concatenated channel. Make it receive on “finishedConcatenated” instead. Now, place another counter (I’ll call it the receiving counter). Make the concatenating counter broadcast on “concatenated” when it reaches the target. Now, make a trigger that decreases the concatenating counter (try saying that five times fast) and also decreases the receiving counter. This trigger should trigger itself. If the counters are expected be over 299, add a delay of .015s.
Make the concatenating counter deactivate the trigger. Make another trigger with a delay of .015s activate the other trigger (channel name “finishedConcatenated”). The new trigger receives on “concatenated”. Make the recursing trigger deactivate the receiving trigger. The receiving counter activates the receiving trigger.
And you’re done!
By replying to this topic, you acknowledge that you have read the entire first post and have at least skimmed through the replies to this topic. You also acknowledge that this means that you know what you are posting about. Asking for definitions of non-GKC unique words is not allowed. Google is a great resource for that. You also agree to not post the words “nice guide” by themself, with no other meaningful words.
If you read the guide and comment constructively, then you won’t violate that.
