Yes.
@Dragontamer player counters do use this.
All player-scoped would use more of your max channels per tick, whereas global scope would only use 1 channel?
1 Like
Idk if the channel cap includes scope as well. @Shdwy you have any thoughts on this?
1 Like
Think of player scope as a bunch of sliders
now put a bar connected to all of them
thatās what global scope is like
(got the analogy from getrithekd drawing, it made sense to me)
Itās not sliders. Each block is a channel broadcast. The horizontal axis is when the channel broadcast is for. In global scope, there is one block that everyone shares. In player scope, each player gets a different block.
If you had a global scoped counter and had a global channel increase it, it should increase by 1, right? But if you had it increase by the player scope, shouldnāt it increase by the number of players?
1 Like
Yes. A property should increase it by one, but relay should increase it by the number of players.
1 Like
this is very interesting!
What are you trying to make though? Iām already making something with it.
Itās just research on this and its applications.
1 Like
Okay! I canāt wait till Iām a regular so I can make a wiki for what Iām making. If only someone made a keyboard for meā¦
1 Like
Ohā¦ I didnāt even think of that. We gotta check that out! I assume itās global, but thatās actually a really important thing to check out.
1 Like
Iāve done some more testing, and it seems that what I thought was global scope can be interpreted just a single channel broadcast for the host.
ok, so @getrithekd just in case my meomory is rusty, all player scope sends a message to all players individaly, while global sends a message to ALL players in one message.
Yeah thatās right, but I doubt that global scope exists.
wait, wdym.
There is litarelly the option global scope.
Or are you saying global scope IS all player scope
okay, so global scope is 1 broadcast that happens for everyone
all player scope is n broadcast(s) for n number of players?
since gkc cant run all n broadcasts in a single tick, could we somehow stop broadcasting while the broadcasts are being run?
here:
letās say there are 5 players
tick 1: broadcast for 1st player
tick 2: broadcast for 2nd player
tick 3: somehow stop the broadcasting, so players 3-5 wont get a broadcast
is this possible?
adding on to the first 2 lines with text:
global scope will take 1 tick to finish broadcasting, no matter the player amount
all player scope will take n ticks to finish broadcasting, as gk runs one broadcast per tick, right?
@getrithekd pls help me Iām so confused
Iām in school rn so I wont reply instantly
1 Like
Iām pretty sure we canā¦ go look at the quantum mechanics postā¦
1 Like
im new 2 technical gk soā¦
could I have the link?
Rip: I luckily got Friday off, same as Monday.
But this is a pretty interesting topic. Wonder how I havenāt stumbled upon or even matter of fact clicked on this.
1 Like