Is it possible to generate the digits of pi?

[SuffyPro97]

You stated, "is it possible to generate the digits of PI?, there won’t be a real answer because it is impossible

[ars3nic]

Like I said, read the prior posts. There are formulas that can be incorporated into block code.

[MonochromeDreams]

Prove that π generation is impossible, then. It’s not completely out of reach, we’re making little steps.

[Suspnded_Arr0w_Shaft]

@ars3nic

using this block code:

I generated this number

I believe @Dungeonmaster’s method will be more exact.

[ars3nic]

Thanks! I’ll test it now.
How can we make this more accurate?

[Boss_1s]

I think you could try using 355/133 (replace 22 with 355 and 7 with 133), because according to AI (flag me if AI is not acceptable):

AI Overview wrote:
The closest common fraction to pi is 355/113, which is within 0.000009% of the actual value of pi. While 22/7 is a widely used approximation, it’s slightly less accurate than 355/113.

Here’s a breakdown:

22/7^[1]:
This fraction is a well-known approximation to pi, often used in everyday calculations. It’s accurate to about three decimal places (3.142857…).
355/113^[2]:
This fraction provides a more accurate approximation of pi, with an error of less than one part in 10 million. It’s accurate to six decimal places (3.141592…).

For many practical purposes, 22/7 is sufficient due to its simplicity. However, 355/113 offers a much higher level of accuracy.

---

1. Google Search

   ↩︎

2. Google Search

   ↩︎

[Suspnded_Arr0w_Shaft]

@Boss_1s is correct.

Using this variation of the previous block code:

we can get this output, which is way more exact than the previous

[Boss_1s]

(post deleted by author cause it got flagged)

[Suspnded_Arr0w_Shaft]

I can make another method, but if we are gonna do that, this should be a research topic.

If not, this topic is probably solved

[Boss_1s]

I did some messin around with the calculator and got a good fraction:

631.46/201^[1], which equals 3.1415920415920…, this is slightly less closer to pi than 355/113 but actually is less than pi

ima come back after adding more decimals

@Suspnded_Arr0w_Shaft

I can make another method, but if we are gonna do that, this should be a research topic.

Yea i agree

@Suspnded_Arr0w_Shaft

If not, this topic is probably solved

per chance…?

---

Edit: 631.460122/201^[2] is actually equal to 3.14159264677…, which per chance makes it a way better candidate to use than 355/113

---

1. or 31573/10050 ↩︎

2. or 315730061/100500000 ↩︎

[Dungeonmaster]

Its not actually pi calculation since its just a bit close, not infinitely close
I just used 9 nines to test for my formula and

And thats since google calcs have a decimal digits limit, or it’ll be more precise
One sec lemme try it in gimkit..

[ars3nic]

I think I would like some more methods, I’ll add the research tag

[Dungeonmaster]

So.. something weird
I originally attempted to use a notification to give me the result, but wherever’s supposed to be pi just is blank..
So i used overlay
Here are resulting stuff, top left is the sin method, top right is the infinite series(the value changing of that seems to differ for everyrun for some reason), lower left is the variable used for the infinite series(code expired)

Yeah lets just use sine method
The most major bad thing: gimkit has limits on decimal digits as well, which caused both methods not to function perfectly
So we cant really.. unless someone comes up with a way to use text for the calculation

[ars3nic]

Could you show screenshots of the devices and method? brain not working today sorry

[Dungeonmaster]

Sure

Sorry for the split, i did not find a way to zoom it in
Property trigger is a number that increases by one every time it runs(once in every 0.01s)

[freedom]

Not exactly possible to do this

[freedom]

@Dungeonmaster on your screan that tab was u search up the answer?

[ars3nic]

Please read the above posts.

[Dungeonmaster]

Well.. i just did
But yes there is a decimal digits limit
Buuuut we can physically try to make it using text

[Dungeonmaster]

…one was for checking formula, one was calculating cube root by hand…
BOT