I’m pretty sure this is AI-generated.
You can use one zone re-sized to the area. Using multiple zones does not save memory, and they’re, by default, invisible. The camera view comment is completely unrelated and incorrect, showing evidence of AI generation.
You’re kidding me. “e.g.”?
Barely anybody uses that anymore, and it’s incredibly common with AI text.
That’s not–
The start of the map has no effect in this unless you put the zone there, and that doesn’t seem like what the text is hinting at. AI commonly gets confused like this.
Ten damage is in no way “deadly” to the player.
Repeaters aren’t low-memory or efficient, like you claimed at the start:
This is literally the way every bit of AI-generated text starts, with a weird introduction that seems like it’s trying to sound professional, but fails every bit of the way.
There’s another instance of you writing exactly like this, intro and all, under a help topic.
Whereas your normal typing style in regular posts is this:
Why Isn’t Generative AI Allowed?
Okay, you’re going to need to strap in for this one.
Generative AI, if you didn’t know, is any AI that generates things-- specifically images and text. But why shouldn’t we use it if it could get so many questions answered much quicker?
Well, there’s the issue of accuracy. Many AIs get easily confused between sources: I’ve seen AI bots claim that Gimkit has “effect devices” and “sunlight settings.”
Then there’s ethical issues. It’s estimated that each 100-word prompt given to an AI bot uses about one bottle of water[1], and that’s not even mentioning the high energy costs.
Finally, legal issues. There have been multiple lawsuits already against AI companies for infringing on copyright by training their bots with copyrighted materials. In a nutshell, Generative AI can be used to “rip off” others’ work.
Sound serious enough for you yet?
Don’t use AI.
Scientists at the University of California – information from the EESI website ↩︎