So youโre saying that we should just ban the innocent people who didnโt do anything and let the people who are actually breaking the rules bypass moderation?
That is wrong!
Iโm not saying that we should ban the innocent people. Iโm saying that the AI had to be banned because the people who were trying to actually train it useful stuff didnโt have much control over the people who were breaking it. So, they canโt do very much to keep the AI intact and kept away from those type of people. The AI had to be banned because it was clearly getting out of control.
Then why not justโฆ ban the people misusing it or tell the creator of the AI personally to implement something that wonโt let it get too off-topic?
Iโm with. Why should we even have gimai in the 1st place?
I mean it was cool but if you just ask the ai questions instead of humans then this forum should be
non-existent and you should use chat Gpt
Iโm not saying that it SHOULD be banned, but it was banned because even though the creator was trying to fix it, it still kept breaking.
I agree, the people who were trying to break it should be banned.
Iโd even be fine with that, I remember it was asking @Blackhole927 if he wanted it to be deleted and then and there, he shouldโve just said it should be because I know he wanted to and nothing bad about the AI after that wouldโve happened.
Iโm saying we shouldnโt have messed around with it that way in the first place. The AI was causing problems, and one way to solve those problems is to ban that account. It would probably be better in the long term for the people who were causing those problems to be punished, but itโs not always easy to tell who those people are - if everyone who talked to the AI during those times was banned, I guarantee there would be many more complaints than there are now. Itโs just a rule of life that actions have consequences, and sometimes those consequences are dealt to people who didnโt do anything to cause those problems. We as individuals just have to do our best to think things through before we do them, and hopefully that will ensure that negative consequences are as minimal as we can make them :]
Whoโs we?
Hey, I get your concerns about AI misuse, but we need to remember that AIs like this one are just tools, not sentient beings with intentions. They work based on their programming and input. When issues arise, itโs usually because of misuse or unintended consequences of the programming. Instead of outright banning the AI, it might be more effective to address the root causes. This could involve refining the AIโs programming or educating users about responsible AI use. While it may be challenging to identify responsible individuals, we shouldnโt dismiss accountability. Perhaps we need better methods for investigation and response. Itโs important to ensure that those responsible face consequences for their actions, extending the principle of accountability to larger systems. We should promote responsible use while maintaining fairness and justice. So, rather than implementing potentially disruptive or unfair solutions, the focus should be on identifying and addressing the underlying causes.
I wrote an explanation about that at some point, but it looks like it got delisted/deleted -__-
But regardlessโฆ
It would probably be better in the long term for the people who were causing those problems to be punished, but itโs not always easy to tell who those people are - if everyone who talked to the AI during those times was banned, I guarantee there would be many more complaints than there are now.
โฆ I explained this already. You give somebody a pretend plastic sword, they hit their friend with it, and the weapon is taken away. Is it the weaponโs fault? No - the weapon being taken away isnโt meant to be a punishment for the weapon, itโs meant to be a punishment for the person who was misusing it. I get that it could be disappointing for some people who wanted to be able to use the โweaponโ/AI without misusing those privileges, but the whole point of taking the thing away is to prevent people from being able to misuse it further.
No Iโm not, but ok?..
This may be unsafe, but bump.
This is a great guide. Shame that a war had to occur hereโฆ
Yeahโฆ
Perhaps in time, the scars of the past will be healed over by new comments. (sticking with the war theme)
That quote was fancy
Dangerous to do this, since there might be a risk of war continuing here.
But, bump.
Is the war over? What was it called? (Imagines world war 3โฆ)
Forum War I