Don’t immediately jump to conclusions. Even if it is AI, they were able to include screenshots and dropdowns which AI cannot. They still wrote at least some of it.
It’s written quite like most AI, but maybe some people write like that, I could be native, but I’ll chance it. Honestly, this feels too general - like this could probably be covered by a range of better-written, highly trusted guides - but that’s my opinon. Feel free to criticise me.
Can we stop flaming people for ai by using ai detectors that have been proven to be inaccurate? They put drop downs and added images which a general LLM wouldn’t be able to do, plus AI models like ChatGPT do not know how to use Gimkit creative well. The author at least created a general outline, at most they used an ai to make the writing look better such as grammarly. Is it really a big deal to use grammarly or another AI tool to improve your writing? They still wrote it themselves.
Also it’s interesting that zerogpt which usually says anything is AI (overscorer) said 0% while got zero (underscorer) said 100%. Ai detectors are terrible and less accurate than relying on other details you can find yourself
Edit: after looking into their other posts they definitely used something like grammarly but that isn’t a big deal